Deviasi Hukum dalam Perjanjian Bisnis yang Menyampingkan Ketentuan Pasal 1266 dan Pasal 1267 KUH Perdata

Muhammad Azkannasabi; Hardian Iskandar

doi:10.19184/jeblr.v4i2.53430

Muhammad Azkannasabi Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
Hardian Iskandar Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jeblr.v4i2.53430

Abstract

A contract that contains an agreement that contains the rights and obligations that must be carried out by the parties in a business is called a business agreement. Failure to fulfill one of the obligations of the parties to the agreement does not automatically terminate the agreement, but this termination must go through a court process as determined by Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code. However, in practice, in agreements, there are many clauses that override the two articles because according to business people, these articles are difficult to apply in a business agreement. This has received special attention from legal experts, practitioners, and judges. In this case, there is a dissenting opinion regarding the waiver of articles 1266 and 1267 of the Civil Code, the first of which they argue that the waiver is acceptable because of the principle of freedom of contract and believes that the provisions in book III of the Civil Code are trapping provisions. Meanwhile, some other opinions do not accept the waiver because they believe that the provisions in book III of the Civil Code are mandatory provisions. Based on the principle of pacta sund servanda, the binding force in an agreement that contains a clause of nullity conditions that override articles 1266 and 1267 of the Civil Code is in solidarity and mutual trust to override the article which applies as a law by the parties who determine it earlier.

References

. Ngadenan. “EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN SEBAGAI KONSEKUENSI JAMINAN KREDIT UNTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KEPENTINGAN KREDITUR DI MUNGKID.” LAW REFORM 5, no. 2 (October 2, 2010): 118. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v5i2.12497.
& Sapto Wahyono, Achmad Rifai. “KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS PENGIKATAN KEMBALI OBJEK JAMINAN DENGAN HAK GADAI TANAH.” Jurnal Yustitia 22, no. 1 (May 31, 2021). https://doi.org/10.53712/yustitia.v22i1.1110.
Agustia, Tria, Yulia Mirwati, and Busyra Azheri. “KEPASTIAN HUKUM OBJEK HAK TANGGUNGAN BELUM TERDAFTAR SEBAGAI JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN” 14 (2019).
Chrisdanty, Febry. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MELALUI PENGADILAN DAN NON LITIGASI OLEH BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK).” Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif 11, no. 2 (January 28, 2021): 52–62. https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v11i2.9.
Dewi, Vinka Kurnia, and Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala. “URGENSIPEMBEBANANJAMINANFIDUSIA PADAKONTENYOUTUBEYANGTELAH MEMILIKIIKLAN(ADSENSE),” n.d.
Dharmanto, Tania Erika, and Retno Dewi Pulung Sari. “PROBLEMATIKA KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN KERJA LISAN” 12 (2023).
Febriyanti, Wiwin Dwi Ratna, and Adi Sulistiyono. “PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA MELALUI GUGATAN SEDERHANA GUNA MENINGKATKAN KEMUDAHAN BERUSAHA DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Privat Law 12, no. 1 (May 30, 2024): 58. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v12i1.85624.
Hartono, Laksamana Varelino Zeustan, and Paramita Prananingtyas. “Aspek Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Secara Online.” Notarius 16, no. 3 (December 29, 2023): 1361–75. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i3.41327.
Hirsanuddin, Hirsanuddin, and Sudiarto Sudiarto. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak (Kreditur Dan Debitur) Melalui Parate Executie Obyek Hak Tanggungan.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (April 26, 2021): 253–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i1.890.
Iskandar, Hardian. “AKIBAT HUKUM WANPRESTASI PADA KASUS PEMBATALAN KONSER MUSIK.” Jurnal Justiciabelen 1, no. 2 (April 9, 2019): 233. https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i2.830.
Jamilah, Siti, Endang Purwaningsih, and Chandra Yusuf. “PEMBEBANAN JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA AKAD MURABAHAH.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 12, no. 1 (July 22, 2021). https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v12i1.1915.
Jiwandono, Muchammad Rizal. “THE MEANING OF IMPOSITION OF UNDERLAND BUILDINGS ON LIABILITY RIGHTS” 1 (2022).
Juliati Br Ginting. “KEKUATAN MENGIKAT PERJANJIAN SECARA LISAN.” The Juris 6, no. 2 (December 13, 2022): 429–36. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.612.
Khumairok, Mar’atul. “REGULASI HUKUM PERBANKAN DALAM MENGHADAPI TREN INOVASI FINTECH DAN KEBERHASILAN INDUSTRI PERBANKAN DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0,” n.d.
Lie, Cathleen, Vivian Clarosa, Yohanes Andrew Yonatan, and Mia Hadiati. “Pengenalan Hukum Kontrak dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia” 7, no. 1 (2023).
Maharani, Oktaviana, and Meilan Arsanti. “Kajian Yuridis Perkembangan Hukum Perbankan Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembaruan Hukum Perdata.” SPEKTRUM HUKUM 20, no. 1 (April 30, 2023): 41. https://doi.org/10.56444/sh.v20i1.3611.
Manggala, Ferdiansyah Putra. “Dinamika Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia Terkait Dengan Prinsip Spesialitas,” n.d.
———. “Legal Protection For Third Parties Who Are Provided As Individual Guarantees By Fintech Peer-To-Peer Lending.” Jurnal Justiciabelen 6, no. 2 (December 19, 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v6i2.6992.
Manggala, Ferdiansyah Putra, and Vinka Kurnia Dewi. “Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual Akibat Wanprestasi oleh Para Pelaku Usaha Ekonomi Kreatif.” Wajah Hukum 8, no. 1 (April 30, 2024): 290. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v8i1.1398.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Nugraha, Sakti, Dwi Andayani, and M.S Tumanggor. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pelaku Usaha E-Commerce Atas Terjadinya Pencurian Data Konsumen Melalui Aplikasi Tokopedia Berdasarkan Pasal 19 dan Pasal 62 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (December 10, 2023): 4896–4909. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1165.
Priyanto, I Made Dedy, Dewa Ayu Dian Sawitri, and Ni Putu Purwanti. “Pelaksanaan Penghapusan Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Secara Elektronik Melalui Notaris di Kota Denpasar” 9, no. 02 (2024).
Ramadhan, Syahrul, Herowati Poesoko, and Ermanto Fahamsyah. “Karakteristik Perjanjian Pembiayaan oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Multiguna.” JURNAL RECHTENS 9, no. 2 (December 30, 2020): 107–26. https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v9i2.789.
Rosari, Lydia Kurnia Putri, Imam Nur Koeswahyono, and Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani. “Implikasi yuridis parate eksekusi obyek hak tanggungan.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 13, no. 1 (April 22, 2022): 68–77. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i1.5189.
Soroinda, Disriani Latifah. “KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA,” n.d.
Yustiana, Yustiana. “Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan terhadap Kredit Macet Bank.” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 23, no. 1 (May 17, 2020): 77–97. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i1.38.
Zaki, Muhammad Arif Azza. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK CIPTA VIDEO YOUTUBE YANG DI UNGGAH ULANG DI INSTAGRAM” 9, no. 9 (n.d.).