Asas Publisitas Perjanjian Perkawinan (Post Nuptial Agreement)
Konsep kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi pihak ketiga
Abstract
Marriage agreements after Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU/XII/2015 have a different concept regarding marriage agreements. A prenuptial agreement expanded to a postnuptial agreement has several problems, namely regarding the publicity of the marriage agreement. The validity of post-nuptial agreements can create uncertainty for third parties regarding the husband and wife's assets. Based on these legal issues, this article aims to determine the formulation of the principle of publicity in arranging marriage agreements (Post Nuptial Agreements) so that they have binding force and provide legal protection to third parties. This research uses normative juridical methods, and there are three approaches used, including: statutory approach; conceptual approach, historical research approach; case approach and comparative approach. The implementation of making marriage agreements in marriages, especially for mixed marriages, still raises doubts. This is due to weaknesses in the formulation of legal rules in the Constitutional Court Decision in the form of unclear norms related to Article 29 of the Marriage Law, as well as the absence of clear and firm regulations regarding the Constitutional Court Decision. Therefore, validation is an important element that must be fulfilled by the parties. On the other hand, there is a vague meaning of the word ratified in Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law which is intended simply to be a marriage agreement or intended to be announced to a third party or other party. Conclusion The urgency of building a concept of legal protection for creditors, in order to provide guarantees of justice, certainty and legal protection in the context of the birth of mortgage rights, through registration as a fulfillment of the principle of publicity which provides a position as a preferred creditor, in particular providing convenience for creditors in obtaining their rights back.
KEYWORDS: SKMHT, Time Limit, Creditors
References
Damanhuri. Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Harta Bersama. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2012.
Darmabrata, Wahyono. Hukum Perkawinan Menurut KUHPerdata 1. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FHUI, 2006.
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. London: Yale University Press, 1969.
Harahap, Yahya. Pembahasan Hukum Perkawinan Nasional. Medan: Zahir Trading, 1976.
Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proposionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2010.
Isnaeni, Moch. Hukum Harta Kekayaan Episentrum BW. Surabaya: Revka Prima, 2020.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2005.
Miqat, Nurul, dan Farida Patittingi. The Rights Of Land In Marriage Agreement Of Miscenegation By Subsquent The Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII 2015 Based On The Customary Law Perspective. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018.
Ngadimah, Mambaul. Formulasi Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Jurnal Kodifikasia, vol. 11, no. 1, (2017).
Niewenhuis, J.H. Hoofdstukken Verbintenissenrecht, diterjemah oleh Djasadin Saragi, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga, 1985.
Nurdiyanawati, Lisa Wage, dan Siti Hamidah. Batasan Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Tidak Melanggar Hukum, Agama Dan Kesusilaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasiala dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 4, no. 1, (2019).
Prawirohamidjojo, R. Soetojo, dan Asis Safioedin. Hukum Orang dan Keluarga. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University Press. Yang sudah diterjemahkan dalam bahasa indonesia oleh Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo, Teori Keadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
Satrio, J. Hukum Harta Perkawinan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Setiyaningsih, Sri, dan Akhmad Khisni. Pre-Marital Implementation Agreement by Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage Which Made by Notarial Deed. Jurnal Akta, vol. 6, no. 1, (2019).
Subekti, R. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa, 1993.
Yusri, Yaswirman Yaswirman, dan Neneng Oktarina, Juridical Analysis of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on Article 29 Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, vol. 6, no. 5, (2019).
Yuvens, Damian Agata. Analisis Kritis terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 14, no. 4, (2018).
