Disruptions and Corporate Human Rights Responsibility

A Flashback to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

This article aims to examine the question of how and to what extent business entities can balance the necessities of making business profits and performing social responsibilities in spite of various disruptions encountered in a pandemic. How and to what extent should their social and human rights responsibilities be managed during the COVID-19 pandemic or a similar crisis? The relevance of these questions arises from the fact that while the main purpose of business is to make profits while providing goods, services, jobs, and sources of income to many people, various disruptions arising from policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have been posing very serious challenges to business management practices, profitability, and sustainability. These challenges may force businesses to compromise on their social and human rights responsibilities to affected stakeholders for the sake of preserving their commercial responsibilities to their shareholders. This article argues that efforts to ensure effective performance for a balanced approach between commercial responsibilities and human rights responsibilities require a corporate organizational culture that takes human rights risks as seriously as commercial risks. This means there must be an organizational attitude that maintains an unwavering commitment to respect human rights while doing business. In practice, this organizational attitude should be manifested through a clear indicator of its commitment to both “know and “show” human rights responsibilities by way of embedding human rights policy and due diligence procedures into corporate culture.   


 


Keywords: Corporate human rights due diligence, disruptions, COVID-19, Pandemic, Business dilemma

References

Apedo-Amah, M. C. et al. (2020), “Unmasking the Impact of COVID-19 on Businesses: Firm Level Evidence from Across the World”, World Bank Group Finance, Competitiveness and Innovation Global Practice, Policy Research Working Paper 9434.

Bhutta, M. et.all (2021), “Forced Labour in the Malaysian Medical Gloves Supply Chain before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence, Scale and Solutions”, Joint Research Report, Modern Slavery & Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre.

Chua, J. M. (2021), “Fashion’s $40 Billion Cancellation Spree Leaves Suppliers Footing the Bill”, Sourcing Journal, 14 December.

Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (2021), Covid-19 and human rights: Assessing the private sector’s response to the pandemic across five sectors”, World Benchmarking Alliance, < https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2021/02/CHBR-Covid-Study_110221_FINAL.pdf > (Access 6/28/2022).

Dingel, J. I and Neiman, B. (2020), “How Many Jobs Can be Done at Home”, Working Paper 26948, at (Accessed 09/10/2022).

European Federation of Food Agriculture and Tourism Trade Union (2020), “Covid-19 outbreaks in slaughterhouses and meet processing plants: State of affairs and demands for action at EU level”, EFFAT Report, 7 September.

Funk, J. (2021), “Government Data: At Least 59K Meat Plant Workers Caught COVID, 269 Died”, Food Manufacturing Newsletter, 27 October.

Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, UN. Doc A/HRC/17/31 (21 March).

Institute for Human Rights and Business (2020), “Respecting Human Rights in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining Companies’ Responsibilities for Workers and Affected Communities”, pp. 5-6, at (Accessed 09/10/2022).

International Labour Organization (2020), “A global survey of enterprises: Managing the business disruptions of COVID-19: Second quarter 2020 situational analysis”, at (Accessed 05/08/2022).

International Labor Organization and World Health Organization (2021), “Covid-19: Occupational Health and safety for Health Workers”, Interim Guidance (2 February) at < https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-HCW_advice-2021-1> (Accessed 10/10/2022).

International Labour Organization (2020), COVID-19 and the world of work:
Country policy responses” < https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/coronavirus/regional-country/country-responses/lang--en/index.htm> (Accessed 07/06/2022).

International Labour Organization (2020), “Recommendations for garment manufactures on how to address the Covid-19 pandemic”, ILO Report on Decent Work in the Garment Sector Supply chains in Asia, < https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/documents/briefingnote/wcms_741642.pdf >.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Art. 26, ICCPR Committee, General comment No. 18: Non-discrimination, Thirty seventh session (1989).

Jones, K. et al. (2021), Lock Down and In Limbo: The Global Impact of COVIG-19 on Migrant Worker Rights and Recruitment”, Report prepared by REFRAME, Geneva: International Labor Organization Publication.

Khambay, A. & Narayanasamy, T. (2021), “Wage theft and pandemic profits: The right to a living wage for garment workers”, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre Report < https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/Unpaid_wages_v9.pdf > (access 25/6/2022).

Koren, M. and Pető, R .(2020), “Business disruptions from social distancing”, PLoS ONE, 15(9).

Lloyd’s Register Foundation, (2020), “The Lloyd’s Register Foundation World Risk Poll: Full report and analysis of the 2019 poll” at (Accessed 09/10/2022).

Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2020), “Avoid the “Three Cs”!: Important Notice to Prevent Covid-19 Outbreaks”, at < https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/3CS.pdf> (Accessed 10/10/2022).

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2020), “Package of Measures for Supporting Businesses in Resuming their Business Operations Formulated”, at (Accessed 09/10/2022).

Reisdorff, K. S. et al. (2020), “Triaging Employee Refusals to Work Due to COVID-19: A Legal Update for Healthcare Employers”, at < https://ogletree.com/insights/triaging-employee-refusals-to-work-due-to-covid-19-a-legal-update-for-healthcare-employers/> (Accessed 09/10/2022).

Shift, Relinger, R. (2014), “Embedding the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights within Company Culture”, New York: Shift.

Stabile, M., et al. (2020), “COVID-19, inequality, and gig economy workers”, VOXEU/CEPR Research-based policy analysis and commentary from leading economists, 01 April.

Touzenis, K. and Cholwinski, R. (2009), “Human Rights of Migrants – Editorial Introduction”, International Journal of Multicultural Society, 11(1).

United Nations, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI), 16 December 1966.

Voss, H. (2020), “Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Human Rights and Modern Slavery Vulnerabilities in Global Value Chains”, Transnational Corporations, 27(2).

Storper, M. and Venables, A. J. (2004), “Buzz: Face-to-face contacts and the urban economy”, Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4).

Wilder-smith, A. and Freedman, D. O. (2020), “Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak”, Journal of Travel Medicine, 27 (2).
Published
2022-12-31
How to Cite
MERE, Winibaldus Stefanus; MADUNG, Otto Gusti Ndegong. Disruptions and Corporate Human Rights Responsibility. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 277-298, dec. 2022. ISSN 2599-2147. Available at: <https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JSEAHR/article/view/34526>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v6i2.34526.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.