Parliaments in Europe Engaging in Post-legislative Scrutiny

Comparing the French, Italian and Swiss Experiences

  • Elena Griglio Libera Universita Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, Italy
  • Nicola Lupo Libera Universita Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, Italy

Abstract

Post-legislative scrutiny (PLS) is not completely new to European parliamentarism. In the last few decades, this activity has experienced rapid development, either pushed by supranational trends on better regulation or fostered by national constitutional reforms. However, the involvement of parliaments in the ex post stage of law-making still remains under-theorised. This article aims at providing a comparative overview of the main rules, practices and trends on post-legislative scrutiny in Europe, focusing on the experience of three bicameral Parliaments: the French, Italian and Swiss Parliaments which have been selected as examples of three proactive approaches to post-legislative scrutiny, based on alternative bicameral arrangements. After providing a general overview of the main options that support the involvement of parliaments in the ex-post stage of law-making, the article examines how the benchmark case studies address the following variables: the internal organisation of the ex-post scrutiny, including the role of the administrative staff; the scrutiny object, either referred to single pieces of legislation or to a whole policy; the scope of the ex-post scrutiny, verifying whether it is interpreted as a purely legal dimension or it comprises also forms of impact assessment; the outcomes of the ex-post scrutiny, and more specifically its contribution to the legislative decision-making. The paper demonstrates that PLS in parliament may lead to political outcomes addressing the government when the form of government, the constitutional framework and the party dimension support a competitive use of this tool in the legislative-executive interaction.

Published
2020-06-27
How to Cite
GRIGLIO, Elena; LUPO, Nicola. Parliaments in Europe Engaging in Post-legislative Scrutiny. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 100-127, june 2020. ISSN 2599-2147. Available at: <https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JSEAHR/article/view/18017>. Date accessed: 01 aug. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v4i1.18017.
Section
Special Edition on Post-Legislative Scrutiny

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.