- Publication Ethics
- Peer Review Process
- Screening For Plagiarism
- Focus & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Peer-Reviewer
- Author Guidelines
- Open Access Policy
- Copyright Notice
- Article Processing Charges
- Retraction and Correction
- Announcements
- Publication Frequency
- Contact Us
- Home
- Make a Submission
- Journal History
- Indexing
Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Historica must follow Focus and Scope and Author Guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must fulfil scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope of this journal.
The work must not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection softaware to do the similarity checking (please use Turnitin or iThenticate to check the similarity). Editors will also check the similarity of manuscripts in this journal by using a Turnitin or iThenticate software.
The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Sometimes (if required) a third peer-reviewer is needed to give critical comments to the submitted manuscript. The review process used in this journal is double blind review system.
Final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely made by Editor in Chief (together with Editorial Board if required for consideration) according to reviewers critical comments. The final decision of manuscript is solely based on the Editor and Editorial Board final review which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by Reviewer).
Publication of accepted articles including the assigning the article to published issue will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.