Effectiveness Of Question Student Have (QSH) Active Learning Model On Learning Outcomes In History Lesson
Abstract
This research is experimental research, experimental research aims to see whether there is a cause and effect relationship between variables. The conditions used during experimental research are that there must be a control class, manipulation of independent variables, and observation. In this research, several stages were carried out, namely the preparation stage, planning stage, implementation stage and evaluation stage. The tool used to analyze the data in this research is SPSS 26 for window software. because from hypothesis testing it is known that there are differences in learning outcomes in the experimental class which was given the QSH model and the control class which was not given the QSH model in class XI SMA Negeri 1 Kencong with results in F (0.079), sig (0.780), and Partial Eta Squared ( 0.001). The effectiveness of the treatment given on student learning outcomes is known from the sig measurement. The result obtained was 0.780. Based on the criteria listed in the table, the effectiveness of the Question Student Have (QSH) model on class XI learning outcomes is included in the high category. So it can be concluded that the Question Student Have (QSH) model is more effectively used to improve learning outcomes in class XI history subjects in colonialism subjects.
References
Ariani, N. 2022. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV. Widina Media Utama
Bloom. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objective Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
Djamarah dan Zaini. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hikmat. 2022. The Readiness of Education in Indonesia in Fasing The Society Era 5.0. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati: Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2953-2961.
Triyanto, J. R. (2024). Tradisi petik tebu manten sebagai sumber belajar sejarah lokal di Sekolah Menengah Atas. AGASTYA: JURNAL SEJARAH DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA, 14(2), 137-150.
Kurniasih, E. 2022. Model Pembelajaran Efektif di Era New Normal. Bandung: CV. Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung.
Lidiawati, HJ. 2023. Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar: Analisis, Implementasi, Pengelolaan dan Evaluasi. Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara.
Nuryadi. 2017. Dasar – dasar Statistik Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Gramasurya.
Payadnya dan Jayantika. 2018. Panduan Penelitian Eksperimen: Beserta Analisis Statistik dengan SPSS. Yogyakaarta: Deepublish.
Puji, R.P.N. 2015. Gaya Belajar Dan Kemahiran Pemikiran Sejarah Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Di Peringkat Universitas. Universitas Kebangsaan Malaysia: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(3).
Puji, R.P.N. 2016. Learning Style of MBTI Personality Types in History Learning at Higher Education. Universitas Kebangsaan Malaysia: Jurnal Ilmiah PPI-UKM,3(6),2356-2536.
Puji, R.P.N. 2018. Edmodo Multimedia: Supporting Technology for Media Learning at Higher Education. Universitas Jember: Journal of English Literatur and Social Siences. 3(1), 2456-7620.`
Rahayu, KNS. 2021. Sinergi Pendidikan Menyongsong Masa Depan Indonesia Di Era Society 5.0.Pendidikan: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar,2(1), 87–100.
Santoso, S. 2014. SPSS 22: from Essential to Expert Skills. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Santoso, S. 2020. Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Multivariat. Jakarta: PT Elex Media.
Saifuddin, M. 2020. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Question Student Have (Qsh) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas Viii Pada Materi Usaha Dan Pesawat Sederhana Di Mts N Brangsong Kendal. Skripsi. Tidak diterbitkan. Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi Uin Walisongo Semarang: Semarang.
Silberman, M. 2014. Active Learning: 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.
Sukmadinata, N. S. 2016. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Suprijono. 2020. Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM . Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Widana, I. W. 2020.Uji Prasyarat Analisis. Lumajang: Klik Media.
