The Effect of Flexiquiz Technology Integrated Problem Based Learning Model on Creative Thinking Skills and Learning Outcomes of Class X Students in History Subject
Abstract
Technological developments in the learning process are able to provide freedom to design and design innovative, creative and adaptive media according to the needs of students. These 4C skills include critical thinking, creativity and being able to think collaboratively. This can be collaborated with the use of a Problem Based Learning model that emphasizes Creative Thinking in students. This research uses a quantitative approach with experimental research type. The research design used a quasi-experimental model with a pretest-posttest, non-equivalent control group design. The sample consisted of 70 students in classes X-A and X-D SMAN 2 Tanggul. Data analysis technique using ANCOVA test. The results of this study obtained: 1) the results of ANCOVA test showed sig value. 0.005 <0.05 Creative Thinking Skills, which means it shows a significant effect of applying the PBL model integrated with FlexiQuiz technology on creative thinking and the value of the partial eta squared of 0.474, which means there is a great influence of applying the PBL model integrated with FlexiQuiz technology on students' Creative Thinking Skills; 2) the results of the ANCOVA test on learning outcomes data show sig. 0.003<0.05 partial eta squared of 0.113 is classified as a medium effect of applying the PBL model on student learning outcomes
References
Arends, Richard. (2010). Learning to Teach Nine Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill Contect Learn Succed.
Asiya, A., Umamah, N & Sumardi. (2022). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Prezi untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Model ASSURE. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Indonesia. 5(1) 77-86
Ayundasari, L. (2022). Implementasi Pendekatan Multidemensional dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya. 16(2), 225-234.
Creswell, John. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: SAGE.
Dwijayanti, L. M., Naim, M., & Umamah, N. (2015). Penerapan Pendekatan Scientific dengan Metode Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Sejarah Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPS 1 SMA Negeri 1 Tenggarang. Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa. 1 (1), 1-8.
Ennis, R.H. (1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. USA: University of Illinois.
Ennis, R.H. (1996). Critical Thinking.USA: Prentice Hall,Inc.
Ennis, Roberth. (2011). The natur of critical thinking: an outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Universitas of Illinois. Retvired form http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents.TheNaturalofCriticalThinking_51711_00.
Hidayati, P. & Wiyanarti, E. (2021). Literasi Digital: Urgensi dan Tantangan dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. JurnaL Sejarah dan Pendidikan Sejarah (FACTUM) 10(2), 155-162.
Jackson, Norman. (2005). Creativity in history teaching and learning: Journals Subjects Creativity in Higher Education Working 1(2), 2-9.
Kemendikbud Nomor 008/H/KR/2022 Tetang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Nela, E. & Supriatna, N. (2021). Creative Learning Through Google Classroom in History Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Conference on Education in Social Sciences (ICESS). 2(1), 83-91.
Ningsih, S., Umamah, N & Naim, M. (2021). Analysis of Prior Knowledge of Educators on Edmodo E-Learning Media and Schoology and its Relationship with Students Critical Thinking Ability. International Conference on Enviromental Geography and Geography Education. 1(2)1-6
Norman Jackson, Oliver, M. dkk. (2006). Developing Creativity in Higher Education: An Imaginative Curriculum. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Putri, N., Rusdiana, D. & Suwarma, I. (2019). The Comparison of Student Creative Thinking Skills Using CBL Implemented in STEM Education and Combined with PSL Worksheet in Indonesian School. Jorunal of Science Learning. 3(1), 7-11.
Safitri, D, Umamah, N & Sumardi. (2019). Accelerated Learning Integrated by Discovery Learning in History Course: How Z Generation Learn. ICEGE: Science: Earth ad Enviromental Science. 1(2) 1-15.
Smith, Patrick and Hussey Trevor. (2008). Learning outcomes: a conceptual analysis. Journal Teaching in Higher Education.
Sugiyono, (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R& D. Bandung: PT ALFABETA.
Swerdlik, Cohen. (2009). Psychology Testing and Assessment An Introduction to Test and Measurement 7th Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill: Primis Online.
Tuckman, Bruce & Harper, B. (2012). Conducting Educational Research- Sixth Edition. United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC.
Umamah, N. (2017). Pembelajaran Sejarah Kesiapannya Menghadapi Tantangan Zaman. Kapita Selekta (Pendidikan) Sejarah Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Umamah, N. (2019). Desain Pembelajaran. Malang: Intelegensi Media.
Umamah, N., et al. (2020). Need Assessment and Performance Analysis on Innovative, Adaptive, and Responsive Curriculum Development Geared to Life Skills. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1-7
Umamah, N., et al. (2020). Teacher Perspective: Innovative, Adaptive, and Responsive Instructional Design Aimed at Life Skills. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1-8.
Webster, Peter. (1990). Creative as Creative Thinking. Journal Music Educators: National Association for Music Education, 76(22), 32-38.
Widiadi, A. & Ronaldy, M. dkk. (2022). Merdeka Berpikir Sejarah: Alternatif Strategi Implementasi Keterampilan Berpikir Sejarah dalam Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya. 16(2), 235-247.
