Law Enforcement of Criminal Defamation Through Electronic Media

  • Septavela Gusti Putri Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia
  • Echwan Irianto Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia
  • Dodik Prihatin AN Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Abstract

Defamation through Electronic Media as regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law No. 19 of 2016 on amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions does not explain in detail the elements of "insulting content and/or defamation;” therefore, the understanding of this term is subjective to the victim. Article 27 also includes the phrase "no rights," suggesting that victims' legal rights in response to defamation are limited. Even so, the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law - Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik) itself does not provide a detailed explanation of these elements. The results found in this study are an objective criteria to assess whether electronic information or electronic documents which can be qualified as defaming. This study argues that defamation occurs if: (a) information or documents are built based on the clarity of the insulted person's identity; (b) the purpose of words is deemed insulting; (c) defamation is addressed to natural person or legal person (d) the content and context of each case, and (e) the allegations. In addition,  a person is said to have the right to commit criminal defamation if carried out in the public interest and by being forced to defend himself.


Keywords: Criminal Defamation, Electronic Media, Indonesia

References

Ali, Mahrus. Hukum Pidana Positif Penghinaan (Edisi Revisi) (Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2016).

—————. ―Pencemaran Nama Baik melalui Sarana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Kajian Putusan MK No. 2/PUU-VII/2009‖, (2010) Volume 07 Issue 06.

Anggara., Komarudin, Asep., & Eddyono, Supriadi Widodo. Menimbang Ulang Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE dalam putusan pengadilan (Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR), 2016).

Chazawi, Adami. Hukum Pidana Positif Penghinaan (Surabaya: ITS PRESS, 2009).

Eddyono, Supriadi. Problem Pasal Pencemaran Nama Baik (Jakarta: ELSAM, 2014).

Fajar Indrawan, Aditya. ―Pengacara keberatan dengan dakwaaan JPU: Posan Yusniar tak sebut nama orang‖, (13 July 2018), online: .

Hamdan. Alasan Penghapus Pidana Teori dan Studi Kasus (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2012).

Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Perkembangannya (Medan,:Sofmedia, 2012).

Manage qolbu. ―Makalah Hukum Pidana‖, (12 July 2018), online: .

PAF Lamitang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1990).

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2003).

Sitompul, Joshua. Cyberspace, cybercrimes, cyberlaw (Jakarta: PT Tata Nusa, 2012).

Sudarto. Ilmu Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: PT Eresco, 1987).

WartaBromo. ―Sempat Diputus Bersalah, Kades Sumbergedang Bebas dalam Dugaan Pencemaran Nama Baik di FB‖, (13 July 2018), online:

Yoga, Nanda. ―Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum tentang Tindak Pidana Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia‖ (2017) Volume 32 Issue 1.
Published
2019-07-29
How to Cite
PUTRI, Septavela Gusti; IRIANTO, Echwan; PRIHATIN AN, Dodik. Law Enforcement of Criminal Defamation Through Electronic Media. Lentera Hukum, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 263-276, july 2019. ISSN 2621-3710. Available at: <https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/ejlh/article/view/8033>. Date accessed: 02 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i2.8033.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.