Menilai Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan
Abstract
This writing examines the consideration of judge to the decision concerning violence case according to Article 170 KUHP (Criminal Code) and evaluates conformity of decision with the provision of Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP (Criminal Procedure Code) in the case of violence happened in Mojokerto. It takes into account of the judge to decide consideration which has the consequence of a decision made by the judge void by law. It uses statute and conceptual approaches analyzed through Article 170 KUHP and Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP linked to the doctrine of experts to corroborate argument from the authors. In conclusion, this research considers the statement of the judge that the defendant guilty of a criminal offense according to Article 170 Paragraph 1 KUHP does not conform with the fact in the court wherein the court it is obtained the explanation from the witness that the letter of Visum et Repertum and a statement of the defendant done are exercised by the defendants caused casualties sustained. In addition, in making decision, the judge does not refer to Article 197 Paragraph (1) letter d and h so in which the decision should be declared void by law.
Keywords: Consideration of Judge, Criminal Offense, Violence
References
Eddy OS Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi (Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka).
H R Abdussalam, Forensik (Jakarta: Restu Agung, 2006).
Komisi Yudisial, Kualitas Hakim dalam Putusan (Jakarta, 2014).
Lilik Mulyadi, Bunga rampai hukum pidana: perspektif teoretis dan praktik (Alumni, 2012).
Lilik Mulyadi, Seraut wajah putusan hakim dalam hukum acara pidana Indonesia: perspektif, teoretis, praktik, teknik membuat, dan permasalahannya (Citra Aditya Bakti,2010).
M Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan sidang pengadilan, banding, kasasi, dan peninjauan kembali (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,2015).
M Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan sidang pengadilan, banding, kasasi, dan peninjauan kembali (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015) hlm. 346.
Moeljatno, Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Bina Aksara).
Moeljatno, KUHP (Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana) (Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara).
Nandika Ajeng Guamarawati, “Suatu Kajian Kriminologis mengenai Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan dalam Relasi Pacaran Heteroseksual” (2009) 5:1 J Kriminol Indones, online:
Njowito Hamdani, Ilmu Kedokteran Kehakiman (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1992).
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mojokerto Nomor: 284/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mjk.
Ronald W Kartika, “Perawatan Luka Kronis dengan Modern Dressing” (2015) 42:7 CDK-230, online:
R Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal (Politea).
R Soenarto Soerodibroto, KUHP DAN KUHAP dilengkapi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung dan Hoge Raad (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada).
R Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal (Politea).
Suto Pratiko, Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Dengan Sengaja Membujuk dan Melakukan Tipu Muslihat Kepada Anak Untuk Melakukan Persetubuhan (Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Nomor: 51/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Pwt) Jenderal Soedirman, 2014) [unpublished].
Yessy Paramita Samadi, “Kajian Yuridis Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2015) IV:2 Lex Crim, online:
Yuli Susanti, “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Aborsi (Abortus Provocatus) Korban Perkosaan” XIV:2 FH UNISBA.
