China’s Unsubstantiated Claims on Baselines
Legal Consequences Affecting International Security
Abstract
For all nations, the stability of the global order is a significant concern. Despite the efforts of the international community, Asia’s peace and security are threatened by China’s aggressive behaviours in the South China Sea. Accordingly, China has claimed nearly the whole South China Sea as its territory, including water internationally acknowledged as belonging to other nations. States have the right to determine and declare their baselines for coastal areas, islands, and archipelagos that fall under their national sovereignty with regard to international law of the sea. Because of the inconsistency with the rules of international law in general and the international law of the sea in particular, China’s claims in this case are unsubstantiated. This article aims to determine China's violations to comply with their obligations under international law, especially in the South China Sea disputes. By using analysed and evaluated methods, this study pointed out the regulations that violate international law contained in documents such as the Declaration of China on the baselines of the territorial sea in 1996, the Coast Guard Law of China in 2021, the Maritime Traffic Safety Law of China in 2021, by using the comparative methods of these documents with the provisions of the international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982. The article also highlights the severe effects of China's behavior on Vietnam, particularly the implementation of the two laws previously mentioned that violate Vietnam's territorial integrity in the Paracel and Spratly Islands. As a result, the paper suggests certain notes for Vietnam and other nations to void China’s aforementioned legal documents. These suggestions, in particular, will contribute to protecting the sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction of Vietnam, and the freedom of navigation and overflight of countries for nations across the world.
Keywords: International Law, International Security, South China Sea.
References
Agim Demirali, “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea and an Archipelagic Reigme” (1976) 13:3 San Diego Law Review>.
Alex P Dela Cruz, “Marching Towards Exception: The Chinese Coast Guard Law and the Military Activities Exception Clause of the Law of the Sea Convention” (2021) 8:2 The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies.
Carlyle A Thayer, “Vietnam’s Strategy of ‘Cooperating and Struggling’ with China over Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea” (2016) 3:2 Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs.
Dorota Pyć, “The Role of the Law of the Sea in Marine Spatial Planning” in Jacek Zaucha & Kira Gee, eds, Maritime Spatial Planning (Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).
Henk Schulte Nordholt, “What are Beijing’s motivations?: The South China Sea dispute” (2016) 40:3 Atlantisch Perspectief 34–38.
Hu Zhang & Qiuwen Wang, “Maritime safety management of foreign vessels in China: New institutional developments and potential implications” (2022) 218 Ocean & Coastal Management.
James Kraska, “China’s Excessive Straight Baseline Claims” in Peaceful Maritime Engagement in East Asia and the Pacific Region (Brill Nijhoff, 2022)
Laurie Chen & Krishn Kaushik, "Chinese militia boats cross Indian, ASEAN warships exercising in the South China Sea", Reuters (9 May 2023), online:
Le Van Bao & Nguyen Thanh Minh, "Process of Establishment of The State of Vietnam For the Two Islands of Hoang Sa and Truong Sa" (2022) 8:3 The Journal of the Middle East and North Africa Sciences.
Matthew Craven, “Between law and history: the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 and the logic of free trade” (2015) 3:1 London Review of International Law, online:
Raul (Pete) Pedrozo, “China’s Revised Maritime Traffic Safety Law” (2021) 97 International Law Studies.
———, “Maritime Police Law of the People’s Republic of China” (2021) 97 International Law Studies.
———, “The China Coast Guard Law (2021): A New Tool for Intimidation and Aggression” (2021) 3:1 Maritime Security.
Rebecca Strating, “Maritime and Sovereignty Disputes in the East China Sea”, The National Bureau of Asian Research (9 February 2021), online:
Sarra Sefrioui, “Adapting to Sea Level Rise: A Law of the Sea Perspective” in G Andreone, ed, The Future of the Law of the Sea (Springer, 2017).
Steven Stashwick, “Missiles and Signals in the Paracel Islands”, The Diplomat (1 April 2016), online:
Ta Quang, “Spratly and Paracel Islands in Vietnamese and international ancient books and maps”, National Defence Journal (22 October 2014), online:
Van Doanh, “Vi tri dia ly va dieu kien tu nhien cua quan dao Hoang Sa”, National Defence Journal (21 September 2015), online:
Vu Thanh Ca, “The continuation of Vietnam’s sovereignty over Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagos”, Political Theory Online Journal – Research Journal and Scientific Voice of Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics (2016), online:
Wataru Okada, “China’s Coast Guard Law Challenges Rule-Based Order: The international community must respond to China’s maritime coercion.”, The Diplomat (2021), online:
Peter Kreuzer, Facing China: Crises or Peaceful Coexistence in the South China Sea, by Peter Kreuzer (Frankfurt: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, 2015).
Robert W Smith, Limits in the Seas - Straight Baseline Claim: China, Background Paper, by Robert W Smith, Background Paper 117 (The United States Department of State Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, 1996).
Sam Bateman & Clive Schofield, State practice regarding straight baselines in East Asia – Legal, Technical and Political issues in a Changing Environment (Advisory Board on the Law of the Sea (ABLOS), 2008).
Taisaku Ikeshima, China’s Dashed Line in the South China Sea: Legal Limits and Future Prospects (Waseda University, 2013).
Warren Christopher, U.S. Department of State Dispatch Supplement, Law of the Sea Convention – Letters of Transmittal and Submittal And Commentary (U.S. Department of State Dispatch Supplement, Law of the Sea Convention, 1995).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
