No Choice but Welcoming Refugees
The Non-Refoulement Principle as Customary International Law in Indonesia
Abstract
The non-refoulement principle requires each country to consider refugees and asylum seekers in their country of origin if they are subject to persecution and threaten their lives. As a geographically strategic country, Indonesia has been a significant crossroad for international refugees and asylum seekers often consider Indonesia their temporary destination. Moreover, the complex situation of international refugees has encouraged to reinterpret of the principle of non-refoulement into various national measures and domestic policies, given that Indonesia is deemed a transit country for refugees and has not ratified the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees. This paper aims to analyse the concept of refugee protection under international law, particularly the non-refoulement principle and investigate the application of the non-refoulement principle in Indonesia. This study employed normative and empirical legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This study confirms that the non-refoulement principle is part of jus cogens norms in international law but does not fit in its application. Indonesia has inconsistency in upholding the non-refoulement principle into the binding normative rules. Refugees have received far less attention from the Indonesian government due to insufficient infrastructure and financial allocation. Moreover, the existing executive regulations do not provide effective enforcement since these regulations have a lower position in the hierarchy and cannot have deterrent sanctions. Hence, ratification of the 1951 Convention is urgently needed by Indonesia to guarantee the protection of refugees within its jurisdiction. At the regional scope, Indonesia can encourage ASEAN countries to adopt good practices in the European Union to set sharing quotas to ensure that not most refugees escape to Indonesia.
Keywords: Customary International Law, Indonesia, Refugees.
References
Chakrabarty, Ishita, “Refoulement as a Corollary of Hate: Private Actors and International Refugee Law” (2020) 35:3 Virginia J Int Law Online 53–74.
Crock, Mary, “In the Wake of the Tampa: Conflicting Visions of International Refugee Law in the Management of Refugee Flows” (2003) 12:1.
C, De Rover, To Serve and To Protect (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000).
Donnelly, Jack, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (Cornell University Press, 2013).
Durieux, Jean-François & Jane McAdam, “Non-Refoulement through Time: The Case for a Derogation Clause to the Refugee Convention in Mass Influx Emergencies | Kaldor Centre” (2004) 16 Int J Refug Law 4–24.
Effendi, A Masyhur & Taufani Sukmana Evandri, HAM dalam Dimensi/Dinamika Yuridis, Sosial, Politik (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2007).
Effendi, A Masyhur, Tempat Hak-Hak Azasi Manusia dalam Hukum Internasional/Nasional (Bandung: Alumni, 1980).
Goodwin-Gill, Guy S & Jane Mcadam, The Refugee in International Law (Clarendon Press, 2000).
Heriyanto, Dodik Setiawan Nur, “Klausula Terkait Perlindungan terhadap Buruh Migran dan Urgensinya untuk Diatur Secara Khusus di dalam Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas antara ASEAN dan Uni Eropa” (2015) 22:3 J Huk IUS QUIA IUSTUM 329–345.
Huda, Ni’matul, Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto & Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana, “The Urgency of the Constitutional Preview of Law on the Ratification of International Treaty by the Constitutional Court in Indonesia” (2021) 7:9 Heliyon.
Hugo, Graeme, George Tan & Caven Jonathan Napitupulu, “Indonesia as a Transit Country in Irregular Migration to Australia” in Marie McAuliffe & Khalid Koser, eds, A Long W to Go Irregul Migr Patterns, Process Drivers Decis (ANU Press, 2017) 167.
Huibers, Theo, Filsafat Hukum (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1995).
J, Bast, “Deepening supranational integration: Interstate solidarity in EU migration Law” Eur Public Law.
J, Monar, “Justice and Home Affairs” (2016) J Common Mark Stud.
Lauterpacht, Sir Elihu & Daniel Bethlehem, “The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non-Refoulement: Opinion” in Erika Feller, Türk Volker & Frances Nicholson, eds, Refug Prot Int Law UNHCR’s Glob Consult Int Prot (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Loescher, Gil, “Refugee Issues in International Law” in Refug Int Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).
Luthvi Febryka Nola, Refugee Employment Prohibition in Indonesia (2021), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia.
Moussalli, Michell, Who is a Refugee? (Geneva: UNHCR, 1982).
Muhyiddin, “Covid-19, New-Normal dan Perencanaan Pembangunan Indonesia” (2020) 4:2 Indones J Dev Plan.
Muzafar, Ali, “Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Indonesia: Problems and Potentials” (2016) 8:2 Cosmop Civ Soc J.
Nickel, James W, Hak Asasi Manusia Refleksi Filosofis atas Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1996).
N, Zaun, “The Power of Strong Regulating States” (2017) Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Prabaningtyas, Raden Ajeng Rizka Fiani, “Indonesia and The International Refugee Crisis: The Politics of Refugee Protection” (2019) 9:2 J Indones Soc Sci Humanit.
Prihandono, Iman, “Pemberian Suaka oleh Negara: Kasus Pemberian Suaka oleh Pemerintah Australia kepada 42 WNI asal Papua” (2006) 21:1 J Huk Yuridika.
Putri, Ganesh Cintika, “The Dilemma of Hospitality: Revisiting Indonesia’s Policy on Handling Refugees Under International Law” (2022) 13:1 J HAM 113–130.
P, McDonough & Tsourdi E, “Greek Crisis: Asylum and EU solidarity” (2021) 4 Refug Surv Q.
Robertson, Geoffrey, Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan Perjuangan untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Global (Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, 2002).
Sari, Risky Vista Puspita, Aries Harianto & Ida Bagus Oka Ana, “Kepastian Hukum Pengaturan Penggunaan Tenaga Kerja Asing di Indonesia” (2018) Lentera Huk 389–402.
Starke, JG, An Introduction to International Law (London: Butterworth, 1977).
Subawa, I Made, “Hak Asasi Manusia Bidang Ekonomi Sosial dan Budaya Menurut Perubahan UUD 1945” (2008) 33:1 Kertha Patrika.
Sulaiman, Hamid, Lembaga Suaka dalam Hukum Internasional (Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002).
Supriadi, Slamet, “International Refugees Protection in the Context of Human Rights” (2021) 7:4 Law Res Rev Q 417–432.
Syahrin, M Alfi, “Tafsir Yuridis Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Imigrasi Nomor IMI-0352.GR.02.07 Tahun 2016 tentang Penanganan Imigrasi Ilegal yang menyatakan diri Sebagai Pencari Suaka atau Pengungsi dalam Kebijakan Selektif Keimigrasian: Pendekatan Teori Hierarki Norma Huku” (2019) 2:1 J Ilm Kaji Keimigrasian.
S, Kneebone, ASEAN and the conceptualisation of refugee protection in Southeast Asian states (New York, 2014).
Tan, Nikolas Feith, “The Status of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Indonesia” (2016) 28:3 Int J Refug Law 365–383.
Vega, Jan González, “Syrian Refugee Crisis and National Security” (2020) 60 Rev Derecho Puertorriq 275–295.
Velez, Leslie E & Claire A Smearman, “Protecting the World’s Most Vulnerable” (2008) 41 Md Bar J 32–37.
Weiner, Myron, “Global Movement, Global Walls: Responses to Migration 1885-1925” in Gung Wu, ed, Glob Hist Migr (Oxford: Westview Press, 1997).
Weissbrodt, David & Isabel Hortreiter, “The Principle of NonRefoulement: Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Comparison with the Non-Refoulement Provisions of Other International Human Rights Treaties” (1999) Buffalo Hum Rights Law Rev.
Wagner, Martin, & Albert Kraler, An Effective Asylum Responsibility Sharing Mechanism (2014) ICMPD Asylum Programme for Member States Thematic Paper at 1,3,10-11.
Wahyun, Tri, “UNHCR: Jumlah Pengungsi di Indonesia Meningkat”, (2015), online:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
