Populist Constitutionalism in Brazil and Peru
Historical and Contextual Issues
Abstract
Given populism's common practice in South America, the region provides a crucial case to identify populism as a prevalent strategy by different ideologies. The link between populism and constitutionalism is paramount because populist governments typically use constituent power and constitutional identity to reach political goals. This study aimed to provide a comparative constitutional analysis of the recent development of populism in Brazil and Peru. The first was the rhetoric and practices of Jair Bolsonaro's government in Brazil, whereas the second was Pedro Castillo's government in Peru regarding constitutional reforms and human rights issues. This comparison justified that Brazil and Peru are presidential republics where harsh political polarization shakes their societies. Bolsonaro and Castillo have anti-corruption discourses and support a new constituent process but present antagonistic economic views. This study was comparative in nature that used a qualitative approach, sourced from bibliographic and documentary research that included specialized literature on South American populism and constitutionalism and the government's plans and legislation. This study showed that both governments have difficulties executing their respective agendas on customs and constituent referendums due to governability problems and important features of the constitutional design, such as eternity clauses, judicial review, and constitutional rigidity. It concluded that the populist strategies of Bolsonaro and Castillo are different. Bolsonarism is antiliberal and promotes human rights regression, whereas Castillo's populism is conservative but democratic. In common, both face the coalitional presidentialism and constitutional protection mechanisms as constraints to putting their political goals entirely into practice.
Keywords: Authoritarianism, Constitutionalism, Fundamental Rights, Populism.
References
Alejandro José Groppo, The two princes: Juan D. Perón and Getulio Vargas: a comparative study of latin american populism (Villa María: Eduvim, 2009).
Alejandra Puente, “Perú: Presidente Castillo en busca de la gobernabilidade”, Diálogo Político (October 2021), online:
Alon Harel, "Courts in a Populist World," Verfassungblog (27 April 2017), online:
Alonso Gurmendi, “Understanding Pedro Castillo: A Guide for the Global North," Opinio Juris (16 June 2021), online:
Alysson Leandro Mascaro, Crise e golpe (São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018).
Ana Julia Bonzanini Bernardi & Andressa Liegi Vieira Costa, “Populismoe fake news na era da pós-verdade: comparações entre Estados Unidos, Hungria e Brasil” (2020) 28 Cadernos de Campo Rev 385.
Arjun Appadurai, “Democracy fatigue” in The Great Regression (Cambridge: Polity, 2017) 1.
Arno Dal Ri Jr & Luciene Dal Ri, “Reception of norms of international law in the Brazilian Constitutional Experience: Doctrinal Conceptions about Executive Power overlays Between the Empire and the Republic (1824- 1988)” (2020) 40:2 Giornale di Storia Costituzionale / Journal of Constitutional History.
Carlos Bejar-Garcia, “Populism and Peru: How a dangerous ideology caused the country’s recent instability?”, Harvard International Review (29 March 2021), online:
Carlos de la Torre, “In the Name of the People: Democratization, Popular Organizations, and Populism in Venezuela” (2013) 95 ERLACS Caribe 27.
Clèmerson Merlin Clève, "The National Security Law and the Defense of Democratic Institutions in Brazil," Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law (April 2021), online:
Denny Indrayana, “Indonesian Constitutional Reform 1999-2002”, Kompas (2008).
Eduardo Piovesan & Pierri Triboli, “Congresso derruba vetos sobre auxílio emergencial e internet para alunos de escolas públicas”, Câmara dos Deputados (June 2021), online:
Elaine Tavares, “Peru: mais um ataque da direita contra o governo”, IELA (November 2021), online:
Ernesto Laclau, “La deriva populista y la centroizquierda latinoamericana” (2006) 205 NUSO 56.
Francisco Corrêa Weffort, O populismo na política brasileira, 5th ed (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2003).
Galimberty Ponce Flores, “Peru” in The 2020 International Review of Constitutional Reform (Austin: University of Texas, 2021).
Gestión, “Pedro Castillo está en contra del enfoque de género en el currículo escolar””, Gestión (7 April 2021), online:
Guilherme Simões Reis, “Necropsy on Brazilian Democracy” (2021) 11 Anuario Latinoamericano – Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales 43.
Italo Beltrão Sposito, "What does our recent past tell us about the future of Peruvian democracy?", E-International Relations (24 August 2021), online:
Jayus, Jayus & Muhammad Bahrul Ulum, “Presidential Power’s Limitation to Emergency Provisions in Indonesia” (2020) 8:2 Jurnal Cita Hukum 343–362.
Jessé Souza, A radiografia do golpe (Rio de Janeiro: Leya, 2016).
John Crabtree, “Populisms Old and New: The Peruvian Case” (2000) 19:2 Bulletin of Latin American Research 163.
José Álvaro Moisés & Francisco Weffort, Crise da democracia representativa e neopopulismo no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2020).
“Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics” (2001) 34:1 Comparative Politics 1.
Kurt Weyland, “Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: How much Affinity?” (2003) 24:6 Third World Quarterly 1095.
Lilia Moritz Schwarcz, Sobre o autoritarismo brasileiro (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2019).
Marcelo Tuvuca, “Bolsa Família x Auxílio Brasil: como separar programa social do eleitoral””, CNN Brasil (17 November 2021), online:
Mattias Kumm, “How populist authoritarian nationalism threatens constitutionalism or: Why constitutional resilience is a key issue of our time," Verfassungblog (December 2018), online:
Max Stabile & Marisa Bülow, “O velho não morreu, o novo já está aqui: informação e participação digital na era do bolsonarismo” in Governo Bolsonaro: retrocesso democrático e degradação política (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2021) 481.
Oscar Vilhena Vieira, A batalha dos poderes (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2018).
Osmar Gonzales, “Los orígenes del populismo latinoamericano.
Una mirada diferente” (2007) 24:66 Cuadernos del CENDES 75.
Paul Blokker, “Populism as a constitutional project” (2019) 17:2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 536–553.
Paul Blokker,“Varieties of populist constitutionalism: the transnational dimension” (2019) 20:3 German Law Journal 332–350.
Perú Libre, “Pedro Castillo Presidente. Plan de Gobierno: Perú al Bicentenario sin corrupción”,Perú Libre (7 April 2021), online:
Pippa Norris & Ronald Inglehart, Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism (Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019).
Ranier Bragon, “Bolsonaro’s Conservative Projects Fail to Gain Steam in Congress," Folha de São Paulo(10 September 2019), online:
Ricardo Kertzman, “Custo Bolsonaro: dólar, inflação, juros, desemprego e fome nas alturas””, Isto É(7 October 2021), online:
Rodolfo Borges et al, “Processos contra ex-presidentes na América Latina, um desafio para a credibilidade da Justiça””, El País(23 April 2021), online:
Rodrigo Uprimny, “The Recent Transformation of Constitutional Law in Latin America: Trends and Challenges” (2011) 89 Texas Law Review 1587.
Rosa Ristawati & Radian Salman, “Indonesia” in The 2020 International Review of Constitutional Reform (Austin: University of Texas, 2021) 148.
Rosenblatt, Paulo, “The Process of Legislative Drafting in a Civil Law Jurisdiction: A Case Study of Brazil” (2012) 1 International Journal of Legislative Drafting and Law Reform 157.
Rosenn, Keith S, “Federalism in Brazil” 43 Duquesne Law Review 23.
Théo Fournier, “From rhetoric to action, a constitutional analysis of populism” (2019) 20 German Law Journal 362.
Verónica Hurtado & Maxwell A Cameron, “The Mining in the 2021 Peruvian Election” (2021) 52:4 Lasa Forum 45.
Vicente Vilardaga & Fernando Lavieri, “A implacável volta da fome”, Isto É(22 October 2021), online:
Zaverucha, Jorge, “The 1988 Brazilian Constitution and Its Authoritarian Legacy: Formalizing Democracy While Gutting Its Essence” (1998) 15:1 Journal of Third World Studies 105–124.
Zoltán Szente, “Populism and populist constitutionalism” in Populist Challenges to Constitutional Interpretation in Europe and Beyond (London and New York: Routledge, 2021) 4.
