Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Ketika Membuat Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Pisah Harta
Abstract
The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, meaning that the marriage agreement is no longer as a treaty made before marriage but may also be made during the marriage association, which was previously restricted by article 29 paragraph (1) of the marriage law that the marriage agreement was made after the marriage. However, the issuance of the decision of the Court MK Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 without being followed by the implementing regulation resulted in practice there are many misunderstandings of understanding and the difference of legal application among the notary especially the notary of Malang city about the making of the deed. This shows the gap between the rules regarding the making of marriage agreement with the practice in society so that there are obstacles in the implementation of the law. This method used is the type of empirical legal research using the approach of legal sociology. As the results of this study indicate: first, that the notary must prioritize the principle of caution because there are still some legal issues related to the making of the marriage certificate of separation of property during the marriage bond in the mixed marriage after the decision of the Court MK Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Second, legal liability if the notary ignores the precautionary principle, may be liable for the deeds he or he has made, as well as the actions of the notary. Third, the application of prudential principles to the process of making marriage certificate deeds during the marriage must comply with the elements of article 1320 KUHPerdata (BW) and UUJN.
KEYWORDS: Prudential Principle, Notary, Postnuptial Agreement, During Marital Bond, Intermarriage.
References
Habib Adjie. Majelis Pengawas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara. Surabaya: Refika Aditama, 2010.
______________ Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008.
______________ Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2011.
116 | Penerepan Prinsip Kehati-hatian Notaris Ketika Membuat Perjanjian Perkawinan Pisah Harta
______________ Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Bandung. Refika Aditama, 2013
Herlien Budiono, Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2007.
Rina Dwi Kurnianingsih. Perlindungan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Bagi Pihak Ketiga Pada Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Belum Disahkan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Tahun 2015.
Salim HS. dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Disertasi. Buku Kedua Jakarta: Raja Grafiko Persada, 2014.
Sjaifurrachman & Habib Adjie. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.
Sudarsono. Sekilas Tentang Wewenang Dan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang (Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara). Malang: Unidha Press, 2013.
Sulikah Kualaria. Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perkawinan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Tahun 2015
Wawan Setawan, Sikap Profesionalisme Notaris Dalam Pembuatan akta Otentik, Media Notariat, Edisi Mei-Juni 2004.
