Formulating Criminal Liabilities Regarding Online Prostitution
Abstract
This study aims to obtain similarities and differences regarding legal formulation in online prostitution. Hitherto, prostitution has remained to exist in Indonesian society. In context, the existing perpetrators of prostitution do not peddle conventionally but also virtually, in which online prostitution that gradually increases is a common term that refers to this phenomenon. The current law enforcement against perpetrators of online prostitution performs as the consequence of the national law in which national laws have yet remained to accommodate in criminalizing perpetrators of online prostitution. The criminalization of perpetrators in online prostitution may contrast with the principle of legality so that national laws should accommodate perpetrators of online prostitution regarding their criminal liability. In particular, these national laws should address whether to prohibit the attitude that proliferates online prostitution so that perpetrators of online prostitution should be accountable for their crimes. Henceforth, this measure intends to avoid the overlap of the principle of legality in criminal law.
Keywords: Online Prostitution, Criminal Liabilities, Principle of Legality.
References
B Simandjuntak. Pengantar kriminologi dan Patologi Sosial (Bandung: Tarsito, 1981).
Barda Nawawi Arief. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, edisi kedua cetakan ke-4 (Jakarta: Kencana, 2014).
Dedik Kurniawan. Membangun Bisnis Sekolah Online (Jakarta: PT. Alek Media Komputindo, 2013).
Deni SB Yuherawan. ―Kritik Ideologis Terhadap Dasar Kefilsafatan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana‖ (2012) 12 JDH.
Dey Revana & Kristian. Kebijakan Kriminal Criminal Policy (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017).
Dyah Ochtorina Susanti & A'an Efendi. Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research) (Sinar Grafika, 2014).
Eddy OS Hiariej. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi (Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016).
Feryna Nur Rosyidah & M Fadhil Nurdin. ―Perilaku Menyimpang: Media Sosial
Sebagai Ruang Baru Dalam Tindak Pelecehan Seksual Remaja‖ (2018) 2 JP&PS.
HA Zainal Abidin Farid. Hukum Pidana 1 (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007).
HA Zainal Abidin Farid & Andi Hamzah. Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: PT. Yarsif Watampone, 2010).
I Made Pasek Diantha. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Jakarta: PT. Kharisma Putra Utama, 2016).
J Sahalessy. ―Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura Ambon‖ (2015) 21 SASI.
Kartono Kartini. Patologi Sosial (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Press, 2005).
Lilik mulyadi. Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Perspektif, teoritis, dan Praktik (Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2008).
Mahrus Ali. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Sinar grafika, 2011).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2016).
Moeljatno. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Intermasa, 2002).
———. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: BinaAksara, 2009).
Mulia TSG. Seks, uang dan kekuasaan, Ter. Ade Armando (Jakarta: LP3ES: Anggota Ikapi, tt).
Regeringen, ―Vi Tar Kampen Mot Prostitution‖ (2019) online:
Ridwan. Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, 1 (2013).
Roeslan Saleh. Pikiran Pikiran Tentang Pertnaggungjawaban pidana (Jakarta: Ghalis Indonesia, 1982).
Soekanto, Soejono. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar (Jakarta: Raja Grafido Persada, 2010).
SR Sianturi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Penerapannya (Jakarta: Alumni Ahaem-Petehaem, 1996).
Sudarto. Hukum Pidana I (Semarang: Badan Penyedia bahan-bahan kuliah Undip, 1987).
Van Bemmelen. Hukum Pidana I Hukum Pidana Material Bagian Umum Cet. 2 (Bandung: Bina Cipta Bandung, 1987).
Widhiana Suarda. Hukum Pidana : Materi Penghapus, Peringan dan Pemberat Pidana (Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2012).
Widodo. Hukum Pidana di Bidang Teknologi Informasi (Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2013).
Yesmil Anwar & Adang. Kriminologi (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2010).
Yesmil Anwar dan Adang. Kriminologi (Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2013)
