Inconsistent Constitutional Court Decisions Resulting in Uncertainty Regarding the Legal Dispute on Regional Head Election Results in Indonesia
Abstract
In Indonesia, the Constitutional Court is the sole interpreter and guardian of the constitution and the decision made by this Court is expected to meet a sense of justice, utility, and legal certainty. This paper argues that there is a contradiction between two decisions ruled by the Court resulted in inconsistent constitutional interpretations. Such inconsistency can be referred to the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 072-073/PUU-II/2004 declaring the Constitutional Court to have the power to adjudicate disputes over the results of regional head elections, while on the other hand, the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 ruled this institution no longer to adjudicate disputes over the results of regional head elections by revoking Article 236C of the revised Regional Government Act No. 12/2008. In doing so, this paper analyzes the impact of such contradictory decisions on uncertainty in the legal dispute regarding regional head election results. This paper concludes that such inconsistency was caused by the application of two different approaches: the first decision applied judicial activism and the latter considered judicial restraint.
Keywords: Constitutional Interpretation, Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism.
References
Dramanda, Wicaksana. "Initiating the Implementation of Judicial Restraint in the
Constitutional Court" (2014) Journal of the Constitution, Volume 11, Number 4.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. "Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism" (2017) Opinion of
Constitutional Magazine, Number 130.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. "Dimensions of Judicial Activism in Constitutional Court Decisions" (2016) Journal of the Constitution, Volume 13, Number 2.
Hoesein, Zainal Arifin Election. "Regional Head in the Transition of Democracy" (2010) Journal of the Constitution, Volume 7, Number 6.
Maggalatung, A Salman. “Relations between Facts, Norms, and Legal Doctrines in Judicial Judgment Considerations "(2014) Legal Journal, Volume II, Number 2. Cross, Frank B. and Stefanie A. Lindquist. "The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism (2007)
Rusli. "Constitutional Review of the Authority of the Constitutional Court in Deciding Election Disputes" (2015) e-Journal Catalogis Volume 3, Number 12.
Sulardi and Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo. "Legal Certainty, Use and Justice for Child Criminal Cases" (2015) Judicial Journal, Volume 8, Number 3.
Setiawan, Sigit. "Inconsistency of Constitutional Court Decision Regarding Authority to Trial Dispute over Regional Head Elections" (2016) Thesis, Muhammadiyah Surakarta Faculty of Law.
Wantu, Fence M. "Antinomy in Law Enforcement by Judges" (2007) Legal Pulpit,
Volume 19, Number 3.
