Death Penalty in Indonesia: Utopia or Reality?
Historically, Indonesia's death penalty does not originate from religious doctrine, but a series of democratization processes agreed upon by legislators. Amidst these processes, there are two competing opinions in responding to Indonesia's death penalty, retentionist and abolitionist. This paper aims to answer why Indonesia's death penalty still exists and remains to be applied though it results in contention. Thus, this paper clarifies existing opinions by collecting data from laws and regulations, books, articles, and other related documentation studies. The data were analyzed in three steps, inter alia, unitization, comparison, and conclusion. This paper shows that the death penalty remains relevant to be applied in Indonesia despite the long struggle of its rejection. This paper concludes that Indonesia's imposition of the death penalty is regarded as worth defending, with specific and selective applications. The specific application means that the death penalty is applicable for corruptors, drug dealers, terrorists, gross human rights violators, and premeditated murders. Selective application means that a convict sentenced to death must be convincingly proven in court with a level of accuracy considered and accepted in the legal sense.
KEYWORDS: Death Penalty, Indonesian Law, Retentionist, Abolitionist.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
LENTERA HUKUM has CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
All papers published in LENTERA HUKUM are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.