The Antinomy of Agrarian Reform Regulations After  the Establishment of the Land Bank Authority

Bayu Praditya Herusantoso

doi:10.19184/jik.v5i1.46593

Bayu Praditya Herusantoso Gadjah Mada University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.46593

Abstract

The establishment of the Land Bank through Government Regulation No. 64 of 2021 introduces a significant framework designed to secure land availability for public, social, national development, economic equality, land consolidation, and agrarian reform purposes. This regulation marks a new phase in agrarian reform, particularly with the introduction of Presidential Regulation 62 of 2023, which replaces earlier regulations (Nos. 88 of 2017 and 86 of 2018) to streamline and enhance the effectiveness of land reforms. Despite its mandate to allocate 30% of land for agrarian reform, the Land Bank faces challenges due to overlapping land acquisition sources, which often intersect with lands designated for agrarian reform. This research utilizes normative juridical methods to analyze these conflicts between the regulations governing the Land Bank and the enhanced framework provided by the Presidential Regulation on Acceleration of Agrarian Reform. The findings highlight a significant overlap between the targeted lands for agrarian reform and those acquired by the Land Bank. This overlap results in discrepancies in land rights among subjects of land redistribution, who are affected differently depending on whether lands are under the management rights of the Land Bank. The study suggests that legal harmonization efforts are necessary to address these conflicts, recommending the application of Lex superiori derogat legi inferiori, where higher legislation should override lower ones. Such harmonization is critical to resolve norm conflicts and ensure the equitable distribution of land rights, thereby facilitating the objectives of agrarian reform.

KEYWORDS : Antinomy, Agrarian Reform, Land Bank

References

Amani, Natasha Khairunisa. “BPS: Jumlah Petani Gurem di Indonesia Naik Jadi 16,89 Juta di 2023,” 2023. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/5471871/bps-jumlah-petani-gurem-di-indonesia-naik-jadi-1689-juta-di-2023?page=4.

Antari, Kadek Widya, Ratna Artha Windari, & Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku. “Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Antinomy Normen (Konflik Norma) Antara Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar-Dasar Pokok Agraria Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal Terkait Jangka Waktu Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah.” e-Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2019): 88–99.

Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. Reforma Agraria di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Azharniyah, Anna. & Ahmad Suhaimi. “Keberadaan Bank Tanah Ditinjau dari Asas Kemamfaatan dan Politik Hukum di Indonesia.” Wasaka Hukum 10, no. 2 (2022): 20–33.

Beny, Wahyu. Mukti Setiyawan. & Nabila Chyntia Dahani. “Model Bank Tanah Pertanian Untuk Mewujudkan Indonesia Berdaulat Pangan.” Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 1 (2020): 78–95.

Butarbutar, E. Nurhaini. “Antinomi Dalam Penerapan Asas Legalitas Dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2012): 145–57. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v1i1.10614.

Guntoro, R. & M A Nugroho. “Konsep Formulasi Bank Tanah untuk Reforma Agraria dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 3 (2022): 6363–71.

Indonesia, CNN. “KPA Sebut Puncak Ketimpangan, 68% Tanah Dikuasai 1% Korporasi.” Diakses 31 Januari 2024. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210913163421-20-693661/kpa-sebut-puncak-ketimpangan-68-tanah-dikuasai-1-korporasi.

Irawan, Andi. “Naiknya Jumlah Petani Gurem.” detiknews. Diakses 8 Mei 2024. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-7321401/naiknya-jumlah-petani-gurem.

Ismanto, Indri Asra. Pujiyono. &Hari Purwadi. “Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Pasca Lahirnya Bank Tanah.” Dalam Problematika Kemudahan Proyek Strategi Nasional: Konflik Norma dan Tantangan Kesejahteraan. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual, 2023.

Lewokeda, Aloysius. “Kementerian ATR/BPN realisasikan redistribusi tanah 3,9 juta Ha.” Antaranews. Diakses 4 Februari 2023. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3800655/kementerian-atr-bpn-realisasikan-redistribusi-tanah-39-juta-ha.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. & A. Pitlo. Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Cetakan II. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2013.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Antinomi dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 3 (2015): 316. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n3.112.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan I. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.

Mujiati. “Perkembangan Peraturan Mengenai Redistribusi Tanah dalam Rangka Reforma Agraria di Kabupaten Boyolali.” Jurnal Bhumi No. 39 (2014).

Permadi, Iwan. “Konstitusionalitas Keberadaan Bank Tanah dalam Pengelolaan dan Penguasaan atas Tanah oleh Negara.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 291. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6678.

Qatrunnada, Aliefia. Bakri. Herdawati. Muhammad Syarifudin. Indra Muchlis Adnan. & Didi Syaputra. “Tantangan dan Peran Pemerintah dalam Pelaksanaan Landreform di Indonesia.” AL-DALIL: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, dan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2023): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.58707/aldalil.v1i3.527.

Safudin, Endrik. “Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Antinomi Hukum (Analisis Terhadap Penerapan Pasal 20 Ayat 2 Huruf B Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman).” Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies 2, no. 2 (2021): 201–29. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v2i2.2592.

Sutaryono. “Memahami Urgensi Bank Tanah.” Kolom OPINI SKH Kedaulatan Rakyat, 2022.

Waryanta. “Reforma Agraria: Momentum Mewujudkan Kemandirian Ekonomi Masyarakat Kecil dalam Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 2, no. 2 (2016): 179. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v2i2.69.