Politik Hukum Penegakan Tindak Pidana Pemilu Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat

Herdi Munte

doi:10.19184/idj.v4i2.43656

Herdi Munte Universitas Darma Agung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/idj.v4i2.43656

Abstract

Abstract

Election criminal law is built and enforced as a legal instrument for eradicating election criminal acts. In fact there is a demand to reform the legal politics of election crime enforcement from the perspective of dignified justice to create honest, fair and dignified elections. The problem studied is how the current law enforcement of election crimes is political and why it is important to reform the law enforcement politics of election crimes based on dignified justice. The research was conducted using a juridical-normative method with statutory and doctrinal approaches. The results of the study show that the regulation of election crimes is contained in a book of election law laws (UU No.7 of 2017 last amended by Law No.7 of 2023) there are as many as 67 articles consisting of offenses and crimes. Many criminal provisions are irrelevant, the enforcement of election criminal law is still far from what was expected, so it is necessary to reform law enforcement in a structured and systematic manner both from the aspect of substance, structure and legal culture. The politics of election criminal law currently places punishment as the foremost legal means, while the demands for the development of law enforcement for election criminal acts that are expected are punishment as a last resort and reform of law enforcement for election criminal acts based on dignified justice (justice that humanizes humans) a necessity in the context of guaranteeing legal objectives (fairness, benefit and certainty) and the objectives of holding elections that are fair and with integrity, legal certainty, effectiveness based on values, principles, norms and rules rooted in the spirit of the nation (volksgeid), namely Pancasila.

Keywords: Legal Politics, Crime, Dignified Elections.

References

Direktoral Jenderal Politik dan Pemerintahan Umum, Naskah Akademik RUU Penyelenggaran Pemilihan Umum, 2016.

Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2017 Nomor 182.

Pasal 1 (1) Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.

Pasal 22E Perubahan Ketiga Undang-Undang Dasar NRI Tahun 1945.

Arief, Barda Nanawi, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 1998).

———, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana; Dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan (Bandung: Sinar Baru, 2005).

Friedman, Lawrence Meil, Law and Society: An Introductions (Stanford University, New Jersey: Prencite-Hall Foundations of Modern Sociology Series, 1979).

International IDEA, International Electoral Standards, Guidelines for Revieweing the Legal Framework of Elections (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2002).

Lubis, M Solly, Manajemen Strategis Pembangunan Hukum (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011).

Maroni, Pengantar Politik Hukum Pidana (Bandar Lampung: Anugrah Utama Raharja, 2016).

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2005).

Nasution, Mirza, Politik Hukum Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia (Medan: Puspantara, 2015).

Prasetyo, Teguh, Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010).

———, Hukum Pidana, edisi revisi ed (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011).

———, Keadilan Bermartabat: Perspektif Teori Hukum (Bandung: Nusa Media, 2017).

Raharjo, Satjipto, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis Tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum (Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2007).

———, Membedah Hukum Progresif (Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2007).

Sinaga, Dahlan, Tindak Pidana Pemilu: Dalam Persfektif Keadilan Bermartabat (Bandung: Media, 2018).

Soedarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana (Bandung: Penerbit Alumi, 1983).

———, Hukum Pidana dan Perkembangan Masyarakat (Bandung: Sinar Bandung, 1983).

Tanya, Bernard L, Teori Hukum, Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi (Surabaya: Penerbit CV Kita, 2006).

Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru) (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008).

Andiraharja, Diyar Ginanjar, “Politik Hukum pada Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu” (2020) 2:1 Khazanah Hukum 24–31.

Junaidi, Muhammad, “Tindak Pidana Pemilu Dan Pilkada Oleh Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu” (2020) 5:2 Jurnal Ius Constituendum 220.

Muliadi, Saleh, “Aspek Kriminologis Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan” (2012) 6:1 Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5.

Nurfauziah, Rahayu, “Perilaku Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Oleh Remaja Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Konstruksi Sosial” (2021) 3:1 Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik 77.

S, Mizan Malik, “Rekonstruksi Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu” (2021) 1:1 Jurnal Huma Betang Demokrasi 113–133.

Santoso, Topo, “Kewenangan Electoral Management Bodies dalam Menangani Tindak Pidana Pemilu dalam Perspektif Perbandingan” (2009) 6:4 Indonesian Journal of International Law 557.

Satria, Hariman, “Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia” (2019) 5:1 Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi 3.

Adhi Wicaksono, “Awasi Pemilu, Bawaslu Ingin Hapus Penegakan Hukum Terpadu”, (2019), online: .

Arief, Barda Nanawi, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) (Universitas Diponegoro).
Baringin, “Bawaslu Temukan 2.724 Kasus Dugaan Pelanggaran Pemilu 2019”, (2019), online: .

Huzaini, Moch Dani Pratama, “Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilu, Menyoal Efektivitas Gakkumdu”, online: hukumonline.com .

Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Universitas Diponegoro, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945, dan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, 2007).

Lazuardy, Glery, “KIPP: Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Tak Maksimal, Kepercayaan Publik Menurun - TribunNews.com”, online: penegakan-hukum-pemilu-tak-maksimal-kepercayaan-publik-menurun>.

Pratama, Bayu, “Total 554 Orang KPPS, Panwas dan Polisi Tewas di Pemilu 2019”, online: CNN Indonesia .