The Principle of Utilization of Rahn in Non-Cash Transaction of Gold at Islamic Banks
Abstract
Non-cash transaction of gold is one type of service by Islamic banks. Non-cash transactions of gold using the contract as a binder between Islamic banks and customers. The contract consists of a murabahah and rahn contract; this contract is contained in a Proof of Ownership of Gold (SBKE). In the rahn contract, there is a stipulation that gold, which is the object of cash, is used as collateral for Islamic banks. This study aims to analyze the validity and suitability of the rahn contract and future conceptions of noncash transactions of gold trading using the principle of benefit. The results showed that the rahn contract on the non-cash transaction of gold cash did not meet the validity of the contract contained in Article 21 KHES (Compilation of Sharia Economic Law) because there were provisions that contradicted Article 18 paragraph (1) item h of Law Number 8 of 1998 about Consumer Protection. Rahn in the non-cash transaction of gold is generally the same as the pawn only in the non-cash transaction of gold; there is an initial transaction in the form of murabahah. The next conception regarding the sale and purchase of gold in cash is a guarantee used no longer in the form of gold, but in the form of proof of ownership of gold or gold certificate, this is based on the MUI DSN fatwa Number 68 / DSN-MUI / III / 2008 concerning (rahn) Tasjily.
Keywords: Non-cash Transaction of Gold, Rahn Contract, Principle of Utility
References
Adiwarman Karim. Bank Islam: Analisis Fiqih dan Keuangan (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Pesada, 2016).
Ahmad Ritaudin. Functional officer. Pegadaian Genteng. (2018), interview on 8 May 2018 at 09.00 PM. Bank Syariah Mandiri. 2016.
Any Nugroho. Hukum Perbankan Syari‟ah (Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2011).
Diego Saba. Customer Service. Bank Syariah Mandiri Banyuwangi. (2018) Interview on 5 May 2018 at 1.30 PM.
Dyah Ochtorina Susanti and A‟an Efendi. Penelitian Hukum: Legal Research (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014).
Frieda Husni Hasbullah. Hukum Kebendaan Perdata: Hak-Hak yang Memberi Kenikmatan (Jakarta: Ind-Hill-Co, 2005).
Gemala Dewi. Aspek-Aspek Hukum dalam Perbankan dan Perasuransian Syariah di Indonesia (Jakarta: Kencana, 2004).
Gita Rahmad Gunawan. 2012. Thesis: Perbandingan Akad Menurut Hukum Islam dan Perjanjian
Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.(2012) Semarang: Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Dipenogoro Semarang.
Irma and Suswinarno. Panduan Lengkap Hukum Praktis Populer Kiat-Kiat Cerdas, Mudah, dan
Bijak Memahami Masalah Akad Syariah (Bandung: Kaifa, 2011).
James Rachels. Filsafat Moral (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2004).
Johny Ibrahim. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Malang: Banyumedia, 2008).
K. Bartens. Etika (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2007).
Kashmir. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014).
Kharufah. „Ala‟ al-Dīn.„Aqd al-Qardh fī al-Syarī„ah al-Islāmiyyah wa al-Qānūn wa al-Wad„ī Dirāsah Muqāranah (Beirut:Muassasah Nawfal, 1982).
Marilang. Hukum Perikatan: Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian (Makassar: Indonesia Prime, 2017).
Muhammad Abduh. Diktat Mata Kuliah: Sosial Institution (Lembaga Sosial) (Medan, PPS USU, 1999).
Muhammad Syafi‟I Antonio. Bank Syariah: Wacana Ulama dan Cendekiawan (Jakarta: Bank Indonesia dan Tazkia Institute, 2001).
Muhammad Syafi‟I Antonio. Bank Syariah: Dari Teori ke Praktik. (Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2001)
M. Sulaeman Jajuli, Kepastian Hukum Gadai Tanah dalam Islam (Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015).
R. Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian (Jakarta: PT. Intermasa, 1987).
Rachmad Syafei. Fiqih Muammalah (Bandung, Pustaka Setia, 2001).
Salim HS. Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016).
Yasardin. Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak (Jakarta: Kencana, 2018).
Yusuf Adi Wibowo. Diktat Mata Kuliah: Hukum Benda (Jember: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember, 2012)
