INTEGRASI STEM DAN HOTS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SAINS: PERSPEKTIF GURU DALAM UPAYA PENINGKATAN SELF EFFICACY SISWA

Erik Perdana Putra; Zulkarnain .; Ahmad Walid

doi:10.19184/se.v7i02.53368

Erik Perdana Putra Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Zulkarnain . Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Ahmad Walid Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/se.v7i02.53368

Abstract

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach integrated with High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) has been recognized as an innovative method in enhancing 21st century skills, including critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration. This study aims to explore science teachers' perceptions of STEM-HOTS implementation and its impact on improving students' self-efficacy in senior high schools in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. This qualitative research used a survey method with semi-structured interviews with 13 science teachers from various public schools. The results showed that 77% of the teachers understood the concept of STEM, but none of them applied it in learning. The teachers realized the benefits of STEM in improving students' skills, but faced constraints such as lack of training, facilities and interdisciplinary collaboration. Nonetheless, teachers showed enthusiasm to implement this approach in the future. This study highlights the importance of continuous professional training, provision of resources and policy support to integrate STEM-HOTS in learning. The results of this study make an important contribution to the development of relevant learning strategies to improve the quality of education in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfika, Z. A., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2019). Modul STEM Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah dengan Tema Rumah Dome. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v7i1.1566
Arikunto, S. (2010). Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
_________. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
California Department of Education. (2015). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Diakses dari http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/stemintrod.asp.
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers' implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
Estapa, A., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: A professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0058-3
Geng, J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2019). Hong Kong Teachers’ Self-efficacy and Concerns about STEM Education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0414-1
Ghufron, M. N., & Rini, R. S. (2012). Teori-teori Psikologi. Yogyakarta: AR-Ruzz Media.
Kapila, V., & Iskander, M. (2014). Lessons learned from conducting a K-12 project to revitalize achievement by using instrumentation in Science Education. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 46-51.
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2004). Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., & Liu, Y. H. (2011). The senior high school students’ learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 161-183.
Milaturrahmah, N., Mardiyana, & Pramudya, I. (2017). Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) as Mathematics Learning Approach in 21st Century. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995151
Nessa, W., Hartono, Y., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2017). Pengembangan Buku Siswa Materi Jarak pada Ruang Dimensi Tiga Berbasis Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Problem-Based Learning di Kelas X. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v3i1.273
Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM Education: Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS). Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Putra, B. K. B., Prayitno, B. A., & Maridi, M. (2018). The Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry and INSTAD towards Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on Circulatory System Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.14302
Ramli, N. F., & Talib, O. (2017). Can Education Institution Implement STEM? From Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 2222–6990. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772
Reeve, E. M., & Avery, Z. K. (2013). Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Program. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 55–69.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suwarma, I. R., & Kumano, Y. (2014). Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM dalam Perspektif Kurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS). Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Winangun, M. M., & Kurniawan, D. (2019). The Barriers of School Using Subject Design Curriculum in Implementing STEM Education: Perspectives of Science Teacher. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341042.3341053
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x