Analisis Risk Maturity Level ISO 31000:2018 pada BUMN Karya di Indonesia
Analysis of Risk Maturity Level ISO 31000:2018 in BUMN Karya in Indonesia
Abstract
The current environment, with lots of fast changes, is full of uncertain strings and risks. Therefore, it is necessary to make the correct and fast decisions necessary for survival and success in the world of construction. This study aims to analyze the application and gaps (gap analysis) and identify steps that companies need to take (action plans) for the gaps that occur so that they can increase the application of risk maturity level ISO 31000: 2018 in state-owned construction companies in Indonesia where this research is conducted. The system consists of 8 variables, each of which is associated with 55 parameters. The review's discoveries explain that BUMN Development Tasks in Indonesia line up with Hazard The Board Standards, Structures, and Cycles, showing their suitability. Overall, the highest average risk maturity level is at PT. Hutama Karya (Persero) Tbk, namely at level 4.43, and the lowest is at PT. Brantas Abipraya (Persero) at level 3.83. The ISO 31000-based risk maturity level is referred to in the action plan, which is adjusted for each attribute's risk maturity level. In 2018, this activity plan is a significant direct that must be finished by expanding the gamble development level to one level higher than the ongoing level.
ABSTRAK
Lingkungan saat ini dengan banyak perubahan cepat penuh dengan ikatan dan risiko yang tidak pasti. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengambilan keputusan yang benar dan cepat diperlukan untuk keberlangsungan hidup dan kesuksesan di dalam dunia konstruksi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan, kesenjangan (gap analysis) serta mengidentifikasi langkah-langkah yang perlu diambil perusahaan (action plan) atas kesenjangan yang terjadi agar dapat dilakukan peningkatan penerapan risk maturity level ISO 31000:2018 pada perusahan BUMN konstruksi di Indonesia dimana penelitian ini terdiri dari 8 variabel dengan 55 parameter. Hasil dari penelitian menjelaskan bahwa BUMN Karya Konstruksi di Indonesia dinilai sudah sesuai berdasarkan Prinsip, Kerangka Kerja, dan Proses Manajemen Risiko. Secara umum, tingkat perkembangan tipikal judi yang paling menonjol di PT. Hutama Karya (Persero) Tbk, khususnya pada level 4.43 dan yang paling turun adalah PT. Brantas Abipraya (Persero) pada level 3,83. Rencana kegiatan diubah sesuai dengan tingkat pengembangan taruhan untuk setiap fitur dan mengacu pada tingkat pengembangan perjudian berdasarkan ISO 31000: 2018 di mana rencana kegiatan ini merupakan petunjuk penting yang harus diselesaikan dengan memperluas tingkat pengembangan perjudian ke satu tingkat lebih tinggi dari tingkat yang sedang berlangsung.
References
Andersson, R., Bargalló, E., & Nordt, A. (2019). A Functional Protection Method for Availability and Cost Risk Management of Complex Research Facilities. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043409
Antonius Alijoyo, F. (2022). The use ISO 31000:2018 in Indonesian Fintech Lending Companies: What Can We Learn? Journal of Business and Management Studies, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms
Caiado, R. G. G., Lima, G. B. A., Nascimento, D. L. de M., Vieira Neto, J., & De Oliveira, R. A. M. (2016). Guidelines To Risk Management Maturity in Construction Projects. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(3), 372. https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2016.v13.n3.a14
Dedi Putra, Nur Istiqomah. (2020). Corporate Governance Dan Karateristik Perusahaan Terhadap Manajemen Resiko Pada Perusahaan Kompas 100. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Finansial Indonesia, 4(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.31629/jiafi.v4i1.2696
Hero Anda Gulindo. (2019). Analisis manajemen risiko yang mempengaruhi kontraktor pada pelaksanaan proyek jalan dan gedung di kabupaten Malinau-Kalimantan Utara. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 2(5), 805–815.
Hoseini, E., Hertogh, M., & Bosch-Rekveldt, M. (2021). Developing a generic risk maturity model (GRMM) for evaluating risk management in construction projects. Journal of Risk Research, 24(7), 889–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1646309
Karunarathne, B. V. G., & Kim, B. S. (2021). Risk Management Application-Level Analysis in South Korea Construction Companies Using a Generic Risk Maturity Model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(9), 3235–3244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-2277-x
Krechowicz, M. (2020). Comprehensive Risk Management in Horizontal Directional Drilling Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001809
Lavrnić, I., Bašić, A., & Viduka, D. (2021). Risk assessment of a solar attack according to ISO 31000 standard. Engineering Review, 41(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.30765/ER.1566
Ni Made Sintya Rani, & Ni Kadek Sri Ebtha Yuni. (2021). Analisis Faktor Risiko Terhadap Keterlambatan Proyek Konstruksi the Himana Condotel. PADURAKSA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa, 10(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.22225/pd.10.1.2367.41-55
Nicholson, A. (2020). Road Safety: Risk Management Perspective. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0001027
Novi Hazriyanti, Benny Hidayat, T. O. (2020). Manajemen Risiko Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Khusus Suku Anak Dalam (SAD) Provinsi Jambi. Rang Teknik Journal, 3(2).
Parviainen, T., Goerlandt, F., Helle, I., Haapasaari, P., & Kuikka, S. (2021). Implementing Bayesian networks for ISO 31000:2018-based maritime oil spill risk management: State-of-art, implementation benefits and challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Environmental Management, 278(September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111520
Perrenoud, A., Short, M. S. E., & Cowan, M. S. D. (2021). Development and Validation of Elements for the Construction Risk Maturity Assessment (CRMA). International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2021.1958959
Rahimi, Y., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Iranmanesh, S. H., & Vaez-Alaei, M. (2018). Hybrid Approach to Construction Project Risk Management with Simultaneous FMEA/ISO 31000/Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Optimization Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001486
Rumpuin, A. F., Wahjudi, D., & Prayogo, D. (2020). Pengembangan Model Mitigasi Risiko Keterlambatan Proyek Berbasis Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Studi Kasus Di Pt X. Dimensi Utama Teknik Sipil, 7(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.9744/duts.7.1.47-58
Shayan, S., Pyung Kim, K., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2022). Critical success factor analysis for effective risk management at the execution stage of a construction project. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(3), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1624678
Simanjuntak, I. J., Siagian, R. T., Prasetyo, R., Rozak, N. F., & Purba, H. H. (2022). Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Konstruksi Jembatan: Kajian Literatur Sistematis. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Manajemen, 20(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.52330/jtm.v20i1.47
Simanjuntak, R., Priyarsono, D. S., & Sumarti, T. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Maturitas Implementasi Manajemen Risiko di IPB University. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 12(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v12i3.32779
Sudharmono, J., & Tunjungsari, H. K. (2021). Evaluasi Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Pada Pt Bumn Abc, Indonesia. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 225. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v5i1.11549
