Akibat Hukum Penandatanganan Surat Kuasa Jual Mutlak Sebelum Debitor Mengalami Kredit Macet

Tiyas Putri Megawati; Aulia Dwi Ramadhanti; Faizah Nur Fahmida

doi:10.19184/jik.v5i1.47362

Tiyas Putri Megawati Gadjah Mada University
Aulia Dwi Ramadhanti Gadjah Mada University
Faizah Nur Fahmida Gadjah Mada University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.47362

Abstract

Credit Agreements are always followed by the provision of guarantees, one of which is land that charged with Dependent Rights or by granting Power of Attorney to Sell from Debtors to Creditors. Referring to the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14/1982 about the Prohibition of the Use of Absolute Power of Attorney, the signing of a Power of Attorney to Sell that made unconditional without terms and condition about discontinuation and contain absolute clauses is expressly prohibited. This opens up risk opportunities in the future, especially for the Debtor. In reality, the signing of a Power of Attorney to Sell in conjunction with credit agreement at the beginning is still widely found. In this study, the author examines the topic using normative juridical methods or legal research. The conclusion of this study shows that the signing of the Absolute Power of Attorney to Sell at the beginning before a bad credit occurs causes the power of attorney being null and void, because it doesn't meet one of the objective requirements of the agreement, especially about a lawful cause as in Article 1320 paragraph (4) of the Civil Code. In terms of the Absolute Power of Attorney to Sell, the Debtor entitled legal protection both in preventive or repressive ways.

KEYWORDS : Absolute Power of Attorney to Sell, Legal Consequences, Non-Perfoming Loan (NPL)

References

J Satrio. Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.

Philipus M Hadjon. Pelindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya. Penanganan oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu,1987.

Sutarno. Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perkreditan Bank. Bandung: Alvabeta, 2013.

Ghina Rezki Putri. “Akta Jual Beli Berdasarkan Akta Kuasa Mutlak Sebagai Pengikat Perjanjian Hutang Piutang.” Indonesia Notary 3, no. 7 (2021).

Lailiyah Shofatul. “Urgensi Analisa 5C Pada Pemberian Kredit Perbankan Untuk Meminimalisir Resiko.” Yuridika 29, no. 2 (Mei-Agustus 2014).

Lestari Rhisca Meci, Febriani Ratu Eva Putri, Putri Novi Tri. “Pengaruh Kredit Perbankan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Provinsi di Sumatera.” Convergence : The Journal Of Economic Development 3, no.2 (Desember 2021).

Salsabila Oktasa, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Kerjasama (Putusan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Provinsi Dki Jakarta Nomor: 08/PTS/MJ.PWN.PRO S/MJ.PWN.PROV.DKI.JAKARTA/IX/ 2020)”, Indonesian Notary 3. no. 4 (Desember 2020).

Sapitri Wiwit dan Rahima Annisa. “Penerapan manajemen risiko kredit macet pada swamitra binaan KB Bukopin Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi dan Keuangan, no.2 (2023).

Tri Wahyu Surya Lestari dan Lukman Santoso. “Komparasi Syarat Keabsahan “Sebab Yang Halal” Dalam Perjanjian Konvensional Dan Perjanjian Syariah.” Al Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 2, no. 1 (2017).

I Nyoman Sandita Nugraha. “Kedudukan Surat Kuasa Menjual Mutlak di Bawah Tangan Sebagai Bentuk Jaminan (Studi Kasus di Lembaga Perkreditan Desa Desa Adat Batur).” Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2023.

Departemen Komunikasi Bank Indonesia. “BI-Rate Tetap 6,00%: Sinergi Menjaga Stabilitas dan Mendorong Pertumbuhan.” diakses 28 Maret 2024, https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/news-release/Pages/sp_260924.aspx.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. “Ingin Ajukan Kredit bank? Kenali Dulu Agunannya.” Diakses 28 Maret 2024, https://sikapiuangmu.ojk.go.id/FrontEnd/CMS/Article/40696#:~:text=Agunan%20ini%20memiliki%20fungsi%20sebagai,atau%20gagal%20memenuhi%20kewajiban%20pembayaran.