The Obligation of Notary as a Reporter in Efforts to Prevent and Eradicate Money Laundering Crime

Erwin Kunta Tejakusuma; Dwi Endah Nurhayati; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir

doi:10.19184/jik.v5i1.46678

Erwin Kunta Tejakusuma University of Jember
Dwi Endah Nurhayati University of Jember
Samuel Saut Martua Samosir University of Jember

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.46678

Abstract

Money laundering is a structured and diverse crime, the implementation of which can utilize financial institutions and institutions outside the financial system. In Government Regulation No. 43/2015 on Reporting Parties in the Prevention and Eradication of ML, it is stated that notary is one of the reporting parties. However, this obligation to report conflicts with the obligation to keep the contents of the deed and all information regarding the deed confidential as stipulated in the Notary Position Law. Notaries in carrying out their duties are bound by an oath of office that they must uphold. One of the notary oaths is regarding notary confidentiality as written in Article 4 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 Year 2004. In addition, notaries in carrying out their positions, based on Article 16 of UUJN Paragraph (1) letter f, notaries are obliged to "keep confidential everything regarding the deed they make and all information obtained for the making of the deed in accordance with their oath / pledge of office, unless the law determines otherwise". The clash of norms between private law and public law certainly requires legal protection in carrying out their positions. The legal protection applied is related to the guarantee of the rights and obligations of notaries, both regarding their obligations as reporting parties in efforts to prevent and eradicate money laundering crimes and notary obligations in the realm of private law. This legal protection is intended so that notaries can be free from claims or lawsuits in carrying out their obligations as reporting parties in efforts to prevent and eradicate money laundering crimes.

KEYWORDS : Notary, Obligations of the Reporting Party, Legal Protection.

References

Adjie, Habib. & R Sesung. Penafsiran, Penjelasan, Dan Interpretasi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, (Bandung, Refika Aditama; 2020)

Amrullah, Arief. Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Perspektif Kejahatan Terorganisasi: Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasannya. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2020)

Dermawan, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Atas Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Dilakukan Oleh Penghadapnya . Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu 7. No. 1. (2017).

Makarim, Edmon. Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik: Kajian Hukum tentang Cybernotary atau Electronic Notary. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2012)

Hartanti Sulihandari, Prinsi-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Notaris, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011),

Hereira Daniela, Legal Protection Of Notaries And Attorneys As Reporting Parties In Money Laundering Offenses. Journal of Jatiswara 35. No. 1. (2020).

K. Kartika, Luluk L, The Relevance of Notary as a Reporting Party in Efforts to Prevent Money Laundering Crimes, Journal Notarius 16. No. 3. (2023)

Lisanawati, Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Terkait Transaksi Keuangan dalam Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Hukum 1, No. 02. (2023).

Maja Adi, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pelapor Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Hukum Fakultas Hukum Narotama Surabaya.

Manuaba Paramaningrat, dkk, Prinsip kehati-hatian notaris dalam membuat akta autentik. Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Udayana, 2018.

Parapat P, dkk. Hukum Kenotariatan Indonesia Jilid 2, (Bandung, CV Media Sains Indonesia, 2022).

Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, (Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, , 1987).

SE_No_AHU_UM_01_01-1232_Panduan_PMPJ_Notaris_pdf_750x_5e398edfd7434.pdf (ini.id) acessed on 13.00 WIB, Saturday, 25 august 2023.

Sugiarto, Umar Said. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017).