Emerging Geospatial Technologies in Environmental Research, Education, and Outreach
Abstract
Drawing on the historical importance of visual interpretation for image understanding and knowledge discovery, emerging technologies in geovisualization are incorporated into research, education and outreach at the Center for Geospatial Research (CGR) in the Department of Geography at the University of Georgia (UGA), USA. This study aimed to develop the 3D Immersion and Geovisualization (3DIG) system consisting of uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) for data acquisition, augmented and virtual reality headsets and mobile devices, an augmented reality digital sandbox, and a video wall. We were working together integrated data products from the UAS imagery, including digital image mosaics and 3D models, and readily available gaming engine software to create augmented and virtual reality immersive visualizations. The use of 3DIG in research is demonstrated in a case study documenting the seasonal growth of vegetables in small gardens with a time series of 3D crop models generated from UAS imagery and Structure from Motion photogrammetry. Demonstrations of 3DIG in geography and geology courses, as well as public events, also indicate the benefits of emerging geospatial technologies for creating active learning environments and fostering participatory community engagement.
Keywords: Environmental Education; Geovisualization; Augmented Reality; Virtual Reality; UAS, Photogrammetry
Copyright (c) 2020 Geosfera Indonesia Journal and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License
References
Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. science, 317(5837), 472-476.
Bernardes, S., Howard, A., Mendki, A., Walker, A., Bhanderi, D., Le, L., ... & Rukangu, A. (2019). Innovative Technologies in Teaching and Learning: Incorporating Recent Developments in Virtual and Augmented Reality into Active Learning at the University of Georgia. AGUFM, 2019, ED11B-0873.
Bernardes, S., Madden, M., Knight, A., Neel, N., Morgan, N., Cameron, K., & Knox, J. (2018). A Multi-Component System For Data Acquisition And Visualization in The Geosciences Based on UAVS, Augmented And Virtual Reality. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII–4, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-45-2018.
Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2011). Introduction to remote sensing. New York : Guilford Press.
Çöltekin, A., Lochhead, I., Madden, M., Christophe, S., Devaux, A., Pettit, C., … Hedley, N. (2020). Extended reality in spatial sciences: A review of research challenges and future directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070439.
Colwell, R. (1997). History and place of photographic interpretation. Chapter 1, In, Philipson, Warren R. (Ed-in-Chief), Manual of Photographic Interpretation, Second Edition, pp. 3-47. Maryland: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
DiGTL. (2020). Disruptive Geospatial Technologies Laboratory (DiGTL), Center for Geospatial Research, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, http://www.cgr.uga.edu/labs/digtl/ and http://www.cgr.uga.edu/labs/digtl/interactions.html, Last Accessed, 14 November 2020.
Hoffman, R. R. (2018). Cognitive and Perceptual Processes in Remote Sensing Image Interpretation. In Remote Sensing and Cognition (pp. 15-32). Florida : CRC Press.
Jensen, J.R. (2007). Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective. Second Edition, New Jersey : Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. (2015). Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
MacEachren, A. M., & Taylor, D. F. (Eds.). (2013). Visualization in modern cartography. Oxford: Elsevier.
Madden, M., Jordan, T., & Dolezal, J. (2006). Geovisualization of Vegetation Patterns in National Parks of the Southeastern United States. In Geographic Hypermedia (pp. 329-345). , Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer.
Madden, M., Jordan, T., Kim, M., Allen, H., & Xu, B. (2009). Integrating remote sensing and GIS: From overlays to GEOBIA and geovisualization. Manual of Geographic Information Systems, 701-720, Maryland : Bethesda.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
Olson, C. E. (1960). Elements of photographic interpretation common to several sensors. Photogrammetric Engineering, 26(4), 651-656.
Petrasova, A., Harmon, B., Petras, V., & Mitasova, H. (2015). Tangible modeling with open source GIS (p. 135). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Sabins, F. F. (2007). Remote sensing: principles and applications. , Illinois: Waveland Press.
Slocum, T. A., Blok, C., Jiang, B., Koussoulakou, A., Montello, D. R., Fuhrmann, S., & Hedley, N. R. (2001). Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304001782173998.
Stefanakis, E., & Peterson, M. P. (2006). Geographic hypermedia. In Geographic Hypermedia (pp. 1-21). Berlin : Springer.
White, R. A., Coltekin, A., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2018). Remote sensing and cognition: human factors in image interpretation. Florida : CRC Press.
